All stories

Porcelain at Court

From its inception, porcelain held paramount importance at the Chinese imperial court and was intricately woven into daily activities. In the 1300s, imperial patronage spurred massive production in Jingdezhen kilns, which was largely enabled by the introduction of a strict division of labor. Porcelain connoisseurship evolved into a symbol of status, attracting substantial capital from the imperial state, local officials, and the nobility.

"Emperor Qianlong is one and two" scroll, Ding Guanpeng 丁觀鵬 (Chinese, active 1708-1771), Qing dynasty (1644-1911), ink and colours on silk. Credits

Imperial Marks

Since the early Ming period (1368-1644), decoration in cobalt blue has been the hallmark of imperial ware. We recognize imperial pieces by their reign marks. The tradition of inscribing porcelain with the emperor’s name began during the Yongle reign (1402-1424). Marks have four or six characters designating the dynasty and the name of the ruling emperor.

 

Explore Blue and White: A Global Fashion
Mantou cup with Dragon, Ming dynasty, Jiajing period (1522-1567), c.1522-1526, porcelain with underglaze cobalt blue, Jiajing period mark. The Bell Collection of Chinese Porcelain, G01.2.9.

Porcelain for Everyday Life

At court, porcelain did not solely function as a “work of art,” as modern eyes might assume, but as an indispensable category of utilitarian wares. Within the Qing imperial precincts, contemporary porcelains fell into three distinct types: dayun (mass-produced pieces for daily use) chuanban (imperial order), and gongci (porcelain tribute). Each played a role within the intricate fabric of imperial life and administration.

 

This dish with phoenixes falls in the category of mass-produced wares, dayun, dated to c. 1680-1730, during the Qing dynasty, Kangxi period (1662-1772). Porcelain with underglaze cobalt blue, Kangxi period mark. The Bell Collection of Chinese Porcelain, G01.2.89.1-2.
This stem cup or butter lamp is an example of chuanban porcelain dated to the Qing dynasty, Qianlong period, c. 1736-1795. It may have been ordered as a diplomatic gift for Tibetan leaders or used in imperial ceremonies. Porcelain with underglaze cobalt blue, Qianlong period mark. The Bell Collection of Chinese Porcelain, G01.2.95. Credits

Porcelain for Tributes

Gongci, or porcelain for tributes, brings together old and new objects. It includes porcelain made at the imperial kilns in Jingdezhen that were overseen by the kilns’ superintendents, rather than by emperors. Extraordinary objects were sometimes offered to the emperor to gain favour. Pieces dating back to the Song-to-Ming periods were also highly prized as antiquities and housed in specific palaces as part of the imperial collection, epitomizing ceramic connoisseurship.

 

A gongci porcelain imitating archaic bronze, vase in bian hu vessel form, Jingdezhen, China, Qing dynasty, Qianlong period (1736-1795). Royal Ontario Museum, Gift of Mrs. H.D. Warren, 911.8.79. Credits